Global Council Network

Europe

Church reform in Europe after 6 years of Pope Francis' Pontificate. 

by Mauro Castagnaro           

 

Half a century after the Second Vatican Council, the Roman Catholic Church lives, especially in Europe, a real "crisis" linked to the affirmation of secularization, understood as a process that leads individuals to live regardless of religious references, with the consequent drastic decline of sacramental practice and of consecrated vocations, and ecclesiastical institutions to lose the monopoly as agencies for the production of shared values, and therefore social, political and cultural weight. To deal with it, starting from the pontificate of John Paul II, the authority of the Church has focused on the revival of Catholic identity through the charismatic mobilization of a mass neocristianity and then, more explicitly with Benedict XVI, through the affirmation of the "naturally" and "rationally" based character of Christian anthropology and ethics. The conviction of being able to counter the feared "irrelevance of the Christian fact" only by proposing a clear doctrine, a rigorous morality and a coherent organization has entailed a re-compacting and ecclesial centralization, to the detriment of the freedom of the particular Churches, of the search for creative answers to the problems of post-modernity, of pluralism. And it blocked the reforms of the ecclesiastical structures, to which the need for "a profound spiritual renewal" was opposed, almost as if the changes in the way of life of the Church were alternative to the inner conversion of its members and not rather among the concretizations of the latter.

All this produced a profound malaise above all among those who had worked with greater enthusiasm to apply the conciliar guidelines, as Henri Tincq, responsible for religious information for the French daily Le Monde from 1985 to 1998, wrote in 2012: "The Catholics so-called ‘conciliars' are discouraged by the hand extended to the fundamentalists, by the fearful withdrawals they see in the doctrine, in the dogma, in the liturgy, in the discipline, by the Roman centralism that resumes more than ever and by the lack of internal discussion, by the slowness of the ecumenical rapprochement movement, the immobility of positions on sexuality after the prohibition of contraception in the 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae, on medically assisted procreation and on homosexual marriage. The obligatory celibacy of the priests, the inferior status of the woman and that of the couples of divorced and remarried, excluded from the sacraments, are lived with ever greater discomfort and criticized".

Between "submerged schism" and reformist activism

In the Churches of the old continent, specifically in those of Western Europe, being the reality of Eastern Europe marked by its own dynamics, this "discomfort" manifested itself in at least three forms: the abandonment of a visible ecclesial belonging by many Catholics, the diffusion among the faithful of convictions (especially in the field of sexual ethics, but also of ecclesiastical discipline) contrasting with the positions of the Magisterium and the presence of organizations that promote reform of the Catholic Church.

First of all, in fact, many Catholics, above all among young people and now also among women, go to swell the ranks of the "indifferent" or "believers without ecclesial membership", also for the scandals related to child sexual abuse committed by priests and religious.

At the same time the polls reveal that in Western Europe the faithful, even practicing, who agree the use of artificial contraceptives, the access of divorced and remarried to the Eucharist and the abolition of the obligation of celibacy for priests oscillate around 75% , exceeding 60% in the case of the ordination of women to the priesthood.

Finally, in these countries this causes the presence of reformist movements of substantial size, especially in German-speaking Europe, which often involve sectors of traditional Catholic associations, especially where, as in Germany, these have a history of relative autonomy from the hierarchy, and draw nourishment from parochial experiences and pastoral organizations marked by the post-conciliar renewal, by more or less institutional groups committed to peace,  safeguarding of creation and solidarity with the South of the world, by the Basic Communities, though numerically greatly diminished compared to the 70s. In the Scandinavian states, where Catholics are between 0.2 and 2 per cent of the population, there are small but very active (as well as in Portugal) critical groups, while in Eastern Europe this presence is almost non-existent.

The pontificate of Francis

In this context, the arrival of Jorge Bergoglio to the papal throne was experienced as a novelty much more welcome in the outskirts of the Church or even outside it than in the ecclesiastical apparatus, often with a growing coldness the closer one approached its center, with a substantial inertia of the national episcopates, caught by surprise and bewildered by a Pope who proposes a way of being and pastoral priorities very different from those for which the bishops (but the judgment could extend to the directors of the Seminary, to the priests under 40 years, to the leaders of lay organizations and ecclesial movements) had been first trained and then called to work under the last two pontificates. Europe too has therefore seen the opposition of the most conservative sectors, with an impatience turned into an open discredit of the initiatives of the bishop of Rome, gradually accused of sloppiness, populism, doctrinal weakness or yielding to the "spirit of the world", finding a channel of expression in a large number of websites and blogs as well as in a lot of publications, which brings together "devout atheist" columnists and economic circles linked to neoliberal thought, sympathizers of the xenophobic right, traditionalist groups and ecclesiastical of the highest order.

On the other hand, and beyond the enormous popular sympathy, a true movement of the ecclesial base - similar to those that accompanied the preparation, carryng out and conclusion of the Second Vatican Council - in support of the papal orientation did not develop: between those who lived with discomfort and sometimes suffering the involution recorded under the last two pontificates seem to prevail not enthusiasm to finally see their ideas re-evaluated and concrete prospects for reform re-opened, but the relief of those who return to breathe after an exhausting apnea, the retreat to the deserved rest after the effort to keep the conciliar flame alive in a long resistance today replaced by the delegation to the Pope "who came from the end of the world", the distrust of those who fear that the current "spring" will rapidly come suffocated by a new "freeze", the belief that the reform of the Church has too long a time for it to be worth dedicating energies to it than to engage in social initiatives that have become more urgent today. Only slowly did the European ecclesial body set in motion, with theologians - unlike the Latin American ones - still hesitant to deepen Francis’ solicitations and intuitions, while the traditional lay associations still appear to be burdened by years of disciplining by the ecclesiastical authorities .

In these six years the pontificate of Francis, in addition to giving centrality to the social dimension of the Christian message, has re-legitimized the reference to the spirit of the Second Vatican Council and restored citizenship to the idea of ​​"reform", for over three decades watched with extreme suspicion from the institution, and changed the ecclesial climate, in particular allowing a free discussion on issues previously excluded from the ecclesial debate, even with censorship measures, which no longer occurred, starting with the role of women in the Church and by a more open pastoral approach to sexual minorities. However, it has not yet introduced any structural change on the issues usually raised by the European reform movements, except for the timid openness to the readmission of the divorced and remarried to the Eucharist contained in the Amoris Laetitia.

This also involved the variegated nebula of European reform groups, which seem to have generally lost some momentum, while maintaining a certain presence and liveliness.

Single issue movements

Thus, the associations of priests forced to abandon the ministry for having married - present from half a century almost everywhere, including Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, and generally committed not only to claim the elimination of the obligation of celibacy for the clergy, but to promote a reflection on a more communitarian and ministerial model of the Church - have seen their ranks shrink, also due to the indirect effect of the numerical decline of presbyteral ordinations. They are sometimes joined by women's associations of priests.

On the other hand, considerable growth and diffusion have experienced the Catholic or ecumenical LGBT groups, which aim not only to make gays and lesbians accept in the ecclesial structures, but to rethink the whole sexual ethics in more inclusive terms.

These two trends were also reflected in the activism of the respective continental networks, which were reduced in the case of the European Federation of Catholic married priests (and in the substantial disappearance of the International Federation for a Renewed Catholic Ministry, which brings together US and Canadian associations and to which some European groups, especially English-speaking ones, were referring) and growing in the European Forum of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Christian Groups. Very combative, but more limited to the German and Anglo-Saxon area, are the movements that, linked to the international organization Women's Ordination Worldwide, are fighting for the presbyteral ordination of women and, more generally, against sexism in the Church. On the other hand, Catholics for choice, committed to the recognition of reproductive rights and therefore to a different approach to sexuality, is present with collectives in Spain and a European consultative group.

However, in various countries, there are movements that, with different shapes and nuances, express a more general orientation towards reform, from English Catholics for a Changing Church, heir to the Catholic Renewal Movement since 1993, which had its roots in the protest against encyclical Humanae Vitae, to the association of Christian critics Dutch Mariënburg, established in 1983, to the Conférence catholique des baptisé-es francophones, to which the French, Swiss and Belgians belong, an extension since 2011 of the Comité de la jupe, born in 2009 and more focused on participation of women in the Church, avoiding any "claiming" attitude.

National and international networks

More recent is the conformation of national platforms between groups which, while maintaining their specificity of interest - sometimes here partecipate also realities committed to promoting democracy and respect for human rights in the Church, to strengthen ecumenical relations “from below", for example by practicing Eucharistic hospitality towards all Christians, to affirm the secularism in relations between State and Church, to support a more radical action by believers for justice and peace (from Femmes et hommes, égalité, droits et libertés dans les Églises et la société in France to Pax Christi in the Netherlands) – or their configuration (communities, magazines, thematic associations, etc.), they share an ecclesial vision and sensitivity different from that prevalent in the ecclesiastical institution.

This is the case, in France, of the Reseaux du Parvis, a federation of 50 organizations set up in 1999 that connects about 10,000 people; similar is the coordination Pour une autre visage d'église et de societé (Pavés), which brings together a dozen realities from French-speaking Belgium; much wider, counting 150 communities, publications and grassroots movements, Redes cristianas was created in Spain in 2006. In Germany  the Initiative Kirche von unten, made up of about forty associations, in some cases Protestant, dates back to 1980, even if it does not exhaust the specter of German critical Catholic movements. And in 2012, was born in Italy, Chiesa di tutti, Chiesa dei poveri, a cartel of a hundred groups.

In Europe there are then a dozen national sections of the International movement "We are Church", founded in 1995 in Austria on the basis of the Appeal to the people of God who asked for the creation of synodal structures with the presence of all the ecclesial components, the involvement of local Churches in the choice of bishops, women's access to all ministries, the abolition of the obligation of celibacy for priests, the readmission of divorced and remarried to the Eucharist, the recognition of freedom of conscience in regulating births and overcoming any discrimination against homosexuals. And some forty groups from 15 countries form the European network Church on the move, which, enjoying a status of participant at the Council of Europe, works towards the community institutions, in particular on the issues of secularism, as a voice alternative to the Commission of the Bishops' Conferences of the European Community (Comece).

Many of these groups and associations have their own publications, magazines and online news, but other mass media, although independent from specific organizations, have a progressive editorial line and give space to the positions and activities of the subjects committed to the renewal of the Church: from Golias in France to Publik-forum in Germany, from Adista in Italy to The Tablet, without forgetting the international theology magazine Concilium.

On the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the Second Vatican Council (2012-2015), many of these movements have launched a proposal for a new aggiornamento to respond to the growing disaffection of believers and to avoid the risk that the Catholic Church, following a model of Christianity, will transform herself in a more or less large sect. Great national meetings were then held which resulted in the world meeting of all reform movements in Rome in 2015, on the occasion of the commemoration of the closing of Vatican II.

Many of these ask for the convocation of a Vatican Council III, often conceiving it as "a conciliar process" rather than as a single assembly and thinking it not limited to the episcopate, but with the participation of all the Church components (clergy, laity, religious and religious).

From "disobedient" priests to the International Church Reform Network

Finally, on the eve of the pontificate of Francis, a renewed impetus to requests for reform came from a series of "manifestos" followed one another in various countries, starting with the memorandum of the German-speaking theologians "Church 2011: starting again is necessary" and above all, from the "Appeal to disobedience" from the Austrian Pfarrer-Initiative, quickly spread, albeit to different degrees and with different nuances or emphasis, to Great Britain, Ireland, Slovakia, Switzerland and Germany, as well as in the United States and in Australia, arriving in 2013 to a world assembly of "disobedient priests" and then also extending to lay groups until it formed the International Church Reform Network last year.

The proposals range from the abolition of the obligation of celibacy for priests, also by espousing msgr. Fritz Lobinger’s proposal of "equipes of ordained ministers", to the presbyteral ordination of women, from the participation of Christian communities to the choice of bishops and parish priests to a more effective episcopal collegiality around the Pope, from the access of the divorced and remarried to the sacraments to overcome every discrimination against sexual minorities, from the full possibility of having recourse to the rite of community confession with general acquittal to the recognition of the right to celebrate the Eucharist in a multiplicity of liturgical forms, from the accomplishment of concrete steps in the direction of unity among the Christian Churches to the choice of being “a poor Church and a Church of the poor” to express a clearer commitment to peace, social justice and environmental protection, etc.

Mobilization of priests (but often also of religious, laity and laity) in favor of such changes is stimulated by the "points of crisis" that believers and Christian communities find themselves living, from the most sensational ones, such as the scandals caused by clerical sexual abuse of minors, to lesser-known ones, but a source of equal attrition, such as the increasingly massive unification of parishes in administrative units whose pastoral care is exhausting the presbyters and leaving the faithful unsatisfied, effectively condemning the extinction Christian communities deprived of pastors due to the decline in vocations and the aging of the clergy.

In some cases (Austria, Germany, etc.) these petitions have led to a dialogue with the bishops and the local episcopal conferences, without however producing concrete results, also because the main claims are considered in the responsibility of the universal Church.

Meanwhile, the deafness to the instances of reform has produced in several countries (especially the Netherlands and the United States, but also Belgium, Switzerland and Austria) the birth of "autonomous" Christian communities (sometimes without a confessional identity, but ecumenical), while some militants have renounced ecclesial participation, in the belief that "the effort to change the Catholic Church is useless".

The traditional reformist movements have shown a poor influence, both for their marginality among official institutions, and for their distance from decision-making places. This, together with the aging of their members and the difficulty in guaranteeing a "replacement" - also because the "culture" that had formed the members of these groups was not only the conciliar one, but also that of "1968", centered on collective organization, claim, conflict, etc., and very distant from that of the young generations - has made them lose momentum, with the death of some aggregations and in others the reduction of the interest for the reform of the Church in favor of other objectives, above all the fight against climate change and the reception of migrants. However, new groups and networks have been born, aiming to connect with the reforming energies of today's youth, with their fast and diversified commitment on different topics, such as the Me-too or Friday for future movements, the March for our lives for arms control in the United States or the recent participation of young people in a new political culture in Slovakia. And everyone looks with great attention and hope to the next Synod of bishops of the Pan-Amazon region, which could also ask for important reforms of the ecclesiastical structure, especially in the area of ​​ministries.

Conclusion

European progressive Catholics’ reflections and actions remain crossed by two questions: 1) "The commitment to the reform of the Church does not take away energy from that, which is also a priority for Christians, to resolve the great challenges that afflict the humanity today, that is, essentially, peace, justice and the defense of the environment?" 2) "Is the hope of a reform of the current clerical system realistic? Or we should aim at the idea of ​​a parallel society, do not fight more against the old system, but to build a new alternative way of being Church?".

Personally, I think that 1) the transformation of society in a more free, faire and democratic sense goes hand in hand with the renewal of the Church, so that it gives space to pluralism, to conscious participation and to communion; even better, both are a condition of the other and vice versa: the "option for the poor" requires a more fraternal, community, synodal, ministerial and inclusive Church, and, at the same time, only a Church in which every one is an equally free and responsible subject, the diversity of charisms can be fully manifested and choices are made in a shared way can really work for the liberation of the oppressed 2) the construction of alternative ecclesial practices is indispensable to nourish the Christian faith today, but the effort to introducing changes in the "great Church" is what prevents these experiences from becoming self-referential and elitist.

Mauro Castagnaro

Asia

Realities, Challenges and the Future of Asian Christianity

by Dr. Paul Hwang, Director of Asian Lay Leaders (ALL) Forum

1. Problems of Asian Churches:

“Systematic & Structural Sin and Lack of Leadership”

1) Cases of Sex abuse by Clergy

- India

i) The Case of Bishop Franco Mulakkal

“Indian authorities charged a Roman Catholic bishop on Tuesday with repeatedly raping a nun in her rural convent, a case that helped make the sexual abuse of nuns a major issue in the church.

Bishop Franco Mulakkal was charged with rape, illegal confinement and intimidation, said Hari Sankar, a district police chief in the southern state of Kerala, India’s Catholic heartland.

The nun who made the accusations, who has not been publicly identified, said she went to police last year only after complaining repeatedly to church authorities. Eventually, a group of fellow nuns launched unprecedented public protests to demand Mulakkal’s arrest. He was arrested but released after a few weeks.

Mulakkal was the official patron of the nun’s community, the Missionaries of Jesus, and wielded immense influence over its budgets and job assignments. The nun said the rapes occurred between 2014 and 2016.” [1]

ii) The Case of Cardinal Oswald Gracias

Mumbai police have been ordered to investigate accusations that Cardinal Oswald Gracias and two auxiliary bishops covered up an accusation of clerical sexual abuse in 2015. The Cardinal Gracias has been a member of the “advisory committee” of 9 cardinals for Pope Francis.

Father Lawrence Johnson was arrested in 2016 on allegations of the sexual abuse of a child, but the family of a boy abused by the priest met briefly with Gracias on November 30, 2015, shortly before the cardinal was scheduled to leave for Rome.

The victim’s father told the court that Bishop John Rodrigues conducted an internal inquiry into the allegation but refused to share the details with the parents and didn’t report the allegation to the police.

According to the 2012 law, all allegations of sexual abuse should be reported to the police. [2]

- Korea

One Salesian priest dispatched as missionary in South Sudan in which he raped a woman missionary was suspended later when the woman victim went to the public as a part of “Me Too” movement. After that CBCK president swiftly made an apology about what happened and promised to set up a committee dealing with such sexual abuse by the clergy under the bishops’ conference and all the dioceses. No single case has been reported so far nor any Catholics know how such committees have been composed and been functioning.

- Philippines

Clergy sex abuse cases in the Philippines are not exposed but a big problem said Fr. Shay Cullen, the Columban missionary priest who has been working with prostituted children for the past four decades. He said, "We have these bishops who have been covering up so much of this abuse, and we know that it is still going on," founder of the People’s Recovery Empowerment Development Assistance Foundation. 

Most of the clergy accused of sexual abuse settled cases out of court, were acquitted, or moved to other parishes by their bishops. There were also priests with pending court cases who were quietly reinstated to pastoral duties.[3]  SHAPE  \* MERGEFORMAT In the pastoral letter in 2018, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) vowed to not “cover up” clergy abuses amid many cases of sexual misconducts by the clergy exposed. The CBCP has already issued a Pastoral Guidelines on Sexual Abuses and Misconduct by the Clergy in 2003 but useless simply because it has not been implemented.

2) Realities of Asian Churches in Terms of “Synodality” by Pope Francis

- India (CCI)

The Indian Catholic Bishops' Conference of India (CBCI) had decided to hold its biannual general meeting in Tirubanantapuram, southern India, in 1996 and reform the discussion structure of the bishops' conference so that all parts of the church, including representatives of laypeople, could participate in the decision-making process. That was how the Catholic Council of India (CCI) was born. Bishops were asked to delegate the right to decide on church-specific issues to the Catholic Council of India, and to discuss and comment on issues that are different at the bishops' meeting. CCI consists of bishops, priests, Religious, lay representatives.

However, it has not been the "discussion structure reform" of the Bishops' Conference. It has not been properly implemented for any reason as of June  2019. Above all, it has not been known by local Catholics themselves which put its representativeness in question. Part of which, it has not dealt with any serious issues in its regular meetings pastoral policies and decision which is directly against its foundation spirit. CCI does not have its own Internet homepage, but operates Face Book which is one of SNS. It updates the news one or two times a year, which is very "light" content such as the basic catechism or celebrations like Christmas, but cannot find anything like "consensus" or "decision."

- Philippine (PCP II)

Joseph Healey, MM, has committed himself on SCCs especially in Eastern Africa by updating data every year which includes those of Asian Churches.[4] I just quote some part of his work here regarding SCCs or BECs in the Phil. which shows his perspective toward them.

He quotes Cardinal Orlando Quevedo of Cotabato by saying:

The Asian vision of church is built on basic ecclesial communities with a collaborative leadership style. Asia's vision of church is relevant to the
vision of Pope Francis who is looking at the periphery rather than at the
center. The "main pastoral priority" in Cotabato is the building of basic
ecclesial communities in which the idea of forming persons of dialog is being
implemented. The idea of leadership that is shared, not just a dictate from
above, but collaborative, consultative -- what is called a participatory church --
is being built in the basic ecclesial communities. This is a participatory church,
a church of the poor, an inculturated church and a church of authentic disciples
-- true followers of Christ, not only in name but in deed.[5]

But it is an “abstract theory” which has little to do with the reality in the Philippine church or Asia as a whole. If you do “reality check” of it you could find the quite opposite results. Healey even brings “the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines” or “PCP II” here held in the country in 1991 where the local church became “the first church which declared the church of the poor” in the world on an official and national level. Regarding BECs, he cites what Carinal Luis Tagle of Manila spoke in a pastoral assembly in 2014:

“Tagle stressed the importance of BECs as the "expression of a renewed church. Basic Ecclesial Communities, under various names and forms.”… “PCP II emphasizes the need for BECs to rally the faithful behind the Second Vatican Council's ‘vision of a renewed Church’ and ‘for the full living of the Christian vocation.’

But I wouldn’t shouldn’t agree with both Quevedo and Tagle in terms of their praising and emphasis on BECs and PCP II.

Dennis Murphy, one of the pioneers and forefathers working for the urban poor in Asia, points out that ten years after PCP II, the Church had to admit that its effort had failed.[6] Bishop Teodoro Bacani, one of three drafters of PCP II documents and the head of draft committee for Religious in the national assembly, wrote a few years later that the Church had thus missed its historic destiny. Murphy made comments on the event by using Bishop Bacani’s article in 2005 titled “Church of the Poor: The Church in the Philippines’ Reception of Vatican II”[7] appeared in East Asia Pastoral Institute’s website.

Murphy criticizes Bishop Bacani who selected the following quotes from the documents of PCP II: “When the Church in the Philippines becomes truly the Church of the Poor, the poor will feel at home in her, and will participate actively, as equal to others, in her life and mission, a sign and instrument for the unity of the whole Filipino nation. The Church of the Poor will practice solidarity with the poor. It will collaborate with the poor themselves and with others to lift up the poor from their poverty.”

Murphy raised a serious question about it by saying “Did the delegates believe that the problems existing between rich and poor would disappear if Catholics knew each other and cared for one another?” He continued to criticize it that “We do not see in the selections any hint of Pope Francis’ passion, any hint that the gangrene of corruption has attacked our whole civilization, or any hint of the Theology of Liberation. Maybe the Church of the Poor can only take root in a society that knows it is rotten with corruption and greed.”

- Cases of FABC

In 80s and 90s BISA, BIRA, BILA, BIMA and other “BIs” have been very active thanks to sincere and capable secretary generals like Fr. Desmond de Sousa from Goa, India who had led OHD at that time of Bishop Labayen supported by, Cardinal Stephan Kim, Cardinal Fumio Hamao, Bishop Bunluen Mansap and many other leaders in the church of Asia. But since late 1990s FABC has begun to be withdrawn in both theology and practice. In Feb. 2019, I met in person and suggested Cardinal Chalres Bo, the new president of FABC, that it is time that we should revitalize FABC in a more “synodal” way.

Suggestions included that necessary reshuffling should be done and followed by a strategy-building steering meeting with the new and other officials of FABC: Through them it could organize Asian Institute for Social Action (AISA) done in the name of OHD in 70s-90s in a more collaborative manner. It includes not only bishops but priests, Religious and lay pastoral workers. Previously we had BISAs first and then proceeded to AISA and FEISA (Faith Encounters in Social Action) until mid. 90s in order to implement what we got from BISAs on the level of all the dioceses in Asia. But this time we could explore the spirit of “Synodality” or “walking together” in an Asian way. Why “Asian” here? What about it? By Asian way we meant a community-centered approach in which communion could and should be realized. That is more “synodal”, so churches from other continents would follow such Asian model. That is especially relevant when it comes to the “Kingdom approach” of FABC theology and its methodology specifically toward to “triple dialogue” with the poor, diverse cultures and great religious traditions in Asia.

The thing here is not the number of participants in the on-going program but those who want to follow “journeying together” on the diocesan level could be invited regardless how many participants would join. It is because they will be the seed or liven to yield multifold cultivation in the diocesan and national levels eventually.

- The Case of Asian Lay Leaders Forum/ ALL Forum

Suggestions of ALL Forum to FABC in its final statement in 2017

1. The Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences (FABC) need to recognize, support and empower the laity by having a dialogue with them at the diocesan, national and the continental level. For this, we suggest FABC to support lay leaders in Asia to form an “Asian Lay Council” as a representative body of the laity in Asia. Further, the FABC could help local bishops’ conferences in the continent to form “National Pastoral Council (NPC)” which does not exist in many Asian countries in order to promote dialogue with the laity. In NPC, clergy, Religious and laity could discuss, work, and make decisions together for a new vision of being church in Asia. Such a “synodolity” or a “process of making a decision together” is one of most important thoughts and deeds of Pope Francis.

2. Asian communities, representing truly diverse peoples and cultures, continue to promote dialogue across communities. In recent years, many movements have surfaced and proliferated with regards to inter-religious dialogue. This is a good development, but we believe more needs to be done in order to counter extremism and violence. Also a more concerted manner is needed in a region or country to promote human rights for every Asian citizen.

3. Regarding Complimentary Relation of FABC and ALL Forum

1) AYA/ATF could be a part of FABC program

- FABC could support young lay leaders in pan-Asian level through the on-going programs of ALL Forum such as Asian Youth Academy (AYA)/ Asian Theology Forum (ATF) which has proved to its effectiveness and efficiency for the last 10 years and the “Moving School” which have been taking place in a country where more young people could have a similar program to AYA/ATF.

2) FABC’s endorsement for ALL Forum’s pan-Asian programs

- Strength: ALL Forum will get fund easier for its all programs and FABC provide young lay leaders in pan-Asia with a regular and consistent formation program.

3) FABC’s endorsement for ALL Forum’s programs in each country

- Strength: ALL Forum and some lay-initiated movements LAMIN (Lay Mission Institute) in Myanmar or TIL (Theology Institute for Laity) in Pakistan could work together on regular basis.

- Obstacles to Realizing “Synodal church” and a Way Forward in Asia

1) Strong clergy-centered culture – Among 9 offices of FABC, for example, all offices are represented by male clergy no single woman involved or participated except one woman Religious for the Office of Consecrated Life. Only one (conservative) lay male is representing one office of 9 in it as secretary general. Similar things are true in parish, diocese and national level of church institutions including seminary professors especially in Korea, Philippines and India.

2) Problem of lay representation: Who would be right and legitimized lay groups or individuals for the possible lay representation body such as “Asian Lay Council” even if it is formed?

Pope Francis and FABC have been surrounded by very powerful and ultra conservative lay groups which are very good at church politics such as ME, Opus Dei, Focolare, Sant’Egidio, Neocatechumenate, and others to which many clergy want to have a relationship with.

3) A very weak leadership in nearly all churches in Asia: Many of bishops appointed under Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI which is one of main reasons for the current corruption and sexual abuse by clergy.

3) Over-evaluated SCCs as FABC Ecclesiology

In the 5th PA of FABC Asian bishops declared SCCs as its official ecclesiology. But it has revealed its limitation to be confined within church wall. The concept of SCCs from South Africa, Lumko Institute to be exact, has indeed failed to adapt to many countries in Asia, the land of diversity, losing its “dynamism from below”, the very spirit of Vatican II. We need to revisit the current SCCs because we should revive such dynamism. We need diverse models of church with/into neighbors in mind no matter what model it would be. One model could be “Basic Human Communities” (BHCs).

- BHCs have been mentioned by Asian theologians and pastoral workers such as A. Pieris esp. in his book Fire and Water in 90s and Bishop Labayen in 70s who explored this BHCs model following Antioch model of church in Act 19-26 for the past 30 years. It went not without a strong lay formation called “YAPAK” (Following footstep of Jesus). We need various model of churches with relevant and consistent lay formation as such. (But YAPAK, unfortunately, had to stop due to lack of fund since 2008.)

- Considering the current parish-centered model of church prevailed in Asia, the role of parish could be a center while BHCs or SCCs as a Bible sharing group and other character communities could have “autonomous functions” but not without a connection with the parish as their center. Infanta diocese in the Philippines has kept going this kind of relationship though it has been weakened since the time of Bishop Labayen.

4) Future Direction of Asian Theology

Some 10 years ago Fr. Felix Wilfred had a dialogue with Fr. Michael Amaladoss, a worldly known Asian theologian especially on inculturation, in which the former asked the latter to change the theological term “inculturation” to “intercultural encounter” in theological discourse. It looks a simple asking but implies a lot of social and religio-cultural issues.

- “Inculturation” is the word which seems to remain still a dualism such as the church as subject and cultures as object. Ever since 1492 and 1521 when Columbus and Magellan “discovered” or “invaded” (from the perspective of people ‘discovered’) LA (San Salvador) and Asia (the Philippines) respectively, the peoples in the two continents “have lost” their language and were forced to think and talk in the colonizers’ language and grammar which were foreign, different from and even did not fit theirs.

- Therefore, “Modernity”, composed of Industrialism, Enlightenment and Christianity, is something the Western colonizers “experienced” on the one hand, and something the colonized will have to “achieve” (from the post-colonialism view point) on the other. However, that would never be achieved in the three continents such as Asia, Africa and LA as a historical fact. So, when it comes to FABC theology it should wrestle fundamentally with the issue of modernity by bringing the matters of “de-colonialism” or “post-colonialism” and “de-imperialism”. Based on the “theologies of pluralism” coming from real lives of peoples and “inter-cultural encounter” in Asia, it should “go public” going beyond “common good” which presupposes that we have something in common by not minding differences bet. classes in economic, cultural and social arenas.

- Also based on the past 50 years of Asian theologies, FABC theologies of Inculturation and interreligious dialogue should deal with history and phenomenon of de-colonialism as a critical response to post-colonialism and de-imperialism in Asia in an interdisciplinary manner.

- We should revisit what we called “Triple Dialogue”, the “trademark” of FABC for the past 50 years, in the light of “regionality”, ethnicity and “inter-civilizational” dialogue especially with Islam not as a religion but a civilization.[8] Recognizing this FABC or Asian Churches as a whole should prepare themselves first by identifying Asian Catholics as “Civil Catholics” with global citizenship in mind. And then we could talk about “Civil Islam” which preconditions the break-up of the typical duality of the sacred or the holy and the profane or the secular. Then, we as laypeople could start to find ways to live together with “others” like Islam people in which the old concept of “interreligious dialogue” led by the clergy should be withdrawn, if not totally abandoned.  

 

[1] Indian bishop charged with repeatedly raping nun, AP, April 9, 2019. (https://www.apnews.com/362eacb80dc04927aef23a82d42f4a65)

[2] “Court in India orders investigation of cardinal after cover-up accusation” CRUX , Nirmala Carvalho May 22, 2019

https://cruxnow.com/church-in-asia/2019/05/22/court-in-india-orders-investigation-of-cardinal-after-cover-up-accusation/

[3] Joe Torres, “Philippine bishops accused of abuse cover-up”, UCAnews.com, June 3, 2013.

(https://www.ucanews.com/news/philippine-bishops-accused-of-abuse-cover-up-/68411)

[4] The latest update of his work is shown in his research book of “Building the Church as Family of God: Evaluation of Small Christian Communities in Eastern Africa” in which he cites Quevedo and Tagle also appeared in the NCR report dated on Feb. 25, 2014. His naïve understanding of SCCs or BECs in Philippines and Asia as a whole does not correctly grasp the realities of them. Even in East Africa it is true to say that SCCs or BECs have been relatively active but not been on the right direction in terms of their role for people in general. A Tanzanian theologian and parish priest named Laurenti Magesa has given a very critical approach toward SCCs and inculturation led by the church hierarchy in Eastern Africa until today. (Regarding this see his articles in African Ecclesial Review 16 and 17, 1974-75). Similarly, the same is true of the situation in Latin America in the light of role of church or BECs or inculturation. It is Aiban Wagua, living with Kuna ethnic group as priest from a Panama Indio community himself, criticizes the church’s double standard or binary attitude toward Indigenous Peoples (Ips) by saying that “The church has always been very sensitive to human rights, to the poor and needy, the marginalized in the dominant society, but when it has been a question of the ‘other’, she has regarded him as an enemy, a pagan, infidel, Moor, Indian… in other words they are different.”  See Aiban Wagua, “Present Consequences of the European Invasion of America,” Concilium 6 (1990): 53. He reiterates such attitude is “spiritual colonization.” From this I don’t hope Joseph Healey over evaluate on BECs or SCCs managed by the church hierarchy if not mystified them especially in Asia, LA and Africa.

[5] Orlando Quevedo in Joshua J. McElwee, “New Philippines Cardinal Calls for Church to

Turn Toward Poor.” National Catholic Reporter (NCR) Website, retrieved 25 February,

2014, http://ncronline.org/news/global/new-philippines-cardinal-calls-church-turn-toward-poor

[6] Denis Murphy, “Too late for a ‘Church of the Poor’?”, INQUIRER.NET, July 21, 2015 https://opinion.inquirer.net/86897/too-late-for-a-church-of-the-poor

[7] Teodoro C. Bacani, Jr.”Church Of The Poor The Church In The Philippines Reception Of Vatican Ii”  East Asian Pastoral Review, Volume 42 2005 Number 12.

http://www.eapi.org.ph/resources/eapr/east-asian-pastoral-review-2005/volume-42-2005-number-1-2/church-of-the-poor-the-church-in-the-philippines-reception-of-vatican-ii/

At the last phrase, he said: “Since then many things have changed, but poverty in the Philippines has not lessened, and its causes have not been eradicated. Corruption remains unchecked. Philippine politics has not improved. It remains the chief obstacle to our progress as a nation. The Church has not been identified by the poor as their friend. There is still hope, so we must ask: Will PCP-II’s vision of a Church of the Poor remain a dream?” (my emphasis)

[8] But it has nothing to do with the dichotomy theory of Samuel Huntington’s “the Clash of Civilizations”. Rather it suggests the inter-civilizational dialogue should consider their religious dimension in the light of actual human lives in a concrete region and ethnictity.

Africa

The most pressing socio-economical as well as challenges for the Church in Africa

by Dr Nontando Hadebe        

Introduction

Africa is a continent that has many stereotypes and sometimes is treated as if it is one country. For many Africa is a continent of wars, conflicts, poverty in the midst of abundant natural resources, political corruption, dictatorships, instability, poverty, diseases and environmental crisis. Yes all these are true but Africa is greater than its current challenges. Let me introduce the continent to you: It is the 2nd largest continent; home to abundant natural and human resources; is home to three main religions Christianity, Islam and African Traditional Religions; has endured 4-5 Centuries of slave trade the worst violations of human rights in history then colonialism and post-colonial challenges and yet rises again and again from the ashes to be a continent of great athletes, human rights champions, authors, scholars, growing economies and evolving democracies. It is home to great civilizations, the Nubians in Sudan who were the first to build pyramids and there are more pyramids in Sudan then Egypt; great kingdoms (for example Ghana, Monomotapa – Zimbabwe, Egypt and Zulu – South Africa). So there is no one narrative or description of Africa there is only diversity, multiplicity and ever changing contexts. Africa is also divided in many ways such as linguistic (legacy of colonialism) – English, French and Portuguese speaking; regionally North, West, East, Central and South; religiously – North Africa is predominantly Islam and Sub-Saharan Africa Christian with Islam and African traditional religions. The greatest growth of Catholic Church has been in Africa and there is uneven distribution among countries for example some countries like Democratic Republic of Congo and Mozambique have as high as 50-70% of Christians being Catholics whereas in South Africa Catholics are only 6-7% of Christians. So even the Catholic experience is different from country to country that is why it is important to mention these facts when speaking about the Catholic Church in Africa – it is diverse and there are differences yet similarities because some of the challenges such as HIV and AIDS, poverty and status of women and sexual minorities are common yet still different in these countries. The Catholic Church continues to be major provider of health, education and social services for marginalized. Through Justice and Peace groups in local parishes there is response to the needs of the poor but as will be discussed later, there are other issues related to equal status of women and minorities that the Church struggles with and in this regard is inconsistent with democratic processes and rights in many countries. Here again there are differences among African countries on these two issues of equal rights and participation of women and also the status of sexual minorities (LGBTI)

Catholic Church responding to Africa

After Vatican 2 Catholic bishops formed a Synod of Bishops to request special focus on Africa because many issues facing Africa where not covered at the Synod for example there was hardly any mention of colonialism and even in discussions on inter religious dialogue no mention was made of African religions. Post Vatican 2 meetings were hosted by Bishops and the result was the issuing of Post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation Ecclesia In Africa Of The Holy Father John Paul II To The Bishops Priests And Deacons Men And Women Religious And All The Lay Faithful On The Church In Africa And Its Evangelizing Mission Towards The Year 2000. The importance of African cultural values, dialogue with African culture, inculturation and response to multiple challenges were emphasized. Below are some quotations from the document:

The Synod considers inculturation an urgent priority in the life of the particular Churches, for a firm rooting of the Gospel in Africa.(88) It is "a requirement for evangelization",(89) "a path towards full evangelization",(90) and one of the greatest challenges for the Church on the Continent on the eve of the Third Millennium.(91)

67. With regard to African traditional religion, a serene and prudent dialogue will be able, on the one hand, to protect Catholics from negative influences which condition the way of life of many of them and, on the other hand, to foster the assimilation of positive values such as belief in a Supreme Being who is Eternal, Creator, Provident and Just Judge, values which are readily harmonized with the content of the faith

42. Although Africa is very rich in natural resources, it remains economically poor. At the same time, it is endowed with a wealth of cultural values and priceless human qualities which it can offer to the Churches and to humanity as a whole.

African cultures have an acute sense of solidarity and community life. In Africa it is unthinkable to celebrate a feast without the participation of the whole village. Indeed, community life in African societies expresses the extended family. It is my ardent hope and prayer that Africa will always preserve this priceless cultural heritage and never succumb to the temptation to individualism, which is so alien to its best traditions.

Inculturation includes two dimensions: on the one hand, "the intimate transformation of authentic cultural values through their integration in Christianity" and, on the other, "the insertion of Christianity in the various human cultures".(87)[1]

The emphasis on inculturation led to transformation of African Catholic Church through liturgy, small Christian Communities and theologies. Mass was conducted in local indigenous languages and even the music was composed by local musicians. African theologies developed inculturation theologies that integrated African cultural values with Christianity particularly in the areas of ecclesiology and Christology. Through inculturation theologies the riches of African culture was appropriated for Christianity. However African women challenged the uncritical appropriation of African culture which advanced patriarchy and failed to address cultural practices that had negative impact on women.  Masenya argues that colonialism and capitalism “only served to reinforce the patriarchy inherent in the African culture. It is an indisputable fact that African culture, like all other patriarchal cultures, has a low view on women[2].” Similarly but with a different emphasis, Dube contends that the “first things first” approach adopted during the struggle against colonialism that liberation a first priority and demanded solidarity between women and men tended to ignore gender oppression within African society[3]. As a result women’s issues were marginalised in both pre and post independence eras and in African theology. However, this status quo has been challenged by feminist consciousness and women’s rights movement that have swept throughout the continent. These movements found fertile ground in the post colonial era which according to Mikell is characterized by “a climate of political experimentation and ‘democratization,’ whether resulting from western pressures or internal shifts within cultural/religious communities[4]” that offer women “unique political opportunities to alter their socio-political positions.” These opportunities are described by Mikell as ‘dialogue opportunities’ which provide a context for women’s voices to be heard and as discussed in chapter two has resulted a new era where women’s rights are enshrined in constitutions and protected by law. This is the socio-political context of African women theologies.

The political situation in post-independence Africa failed to materialize the promises of new life and in response Africa Munus was produced focusing on political and economic issues that continued to deprive Africans of their rights to life. Similarly the church in South Africa in response to apartheid and theologies that supported the state and racism produced the Kairos Document which was ecumenical and inclusive of both laity, religious leaders and theologians. It used the principles from liberation theology of ‘See Judge and Act’[5]. This is the definition of the Kairos document:

The KAIROS document is a Christian, biblical and theological comment on the political crisis in South Africa today. It is an attempt by concerned Christians in South Africa to reflect on the situation of death in our country. It is a critique of the current theological models that determine the type of activities the Church engages in to try to resolve the problems of the country. It is an attempt to develop, out of this perplexing situation, an alternative biblical and theological model that will in turn lead to forms of activity that will make a real difference to the future of our country.

The time has come. The moment of truth has arrived. South Africa has been plunged into a crisis that is shaking the foundations and there is every indication that the crisis has only just begun and that it will deepen and become even more threatening in the months to come. It is the KAIROS or moment of truth not only for apartheid but also for the Church.

What the present crisis shows up, although many of us have known it all along, is that the Church is divided. More and more people are now saying that there are in fact two Churches in South Africa--a White Church and a Black Church. Even within the same denomination there are in fact two Churches. In the life and death conflict between different social forces that has come to a head in South Africa today, there are Christians (or at least people who profess to be Christians) on both sides of the conflict--and some who are trying to sit on the fence!

So we can see that theology in Africa is dynamic and contextual. Inculturation, Kairos, black liberation and women’s theologies represent the many faces of theology in Africa.

However there is another part of Africa that I think the Church struggles with and that is the: growing democratization of society that encourages debate, contestation and equality this has a lot of implications for the Church particularly the equal rights of women, reproductive health and decriminalization of homosexuality which will be discussed later; the legal systems that continue to be used to challenge all forms of discrimination; the migration to other churches particularly Pentecostal and Evangelical Churches; the changing nature of the family – the nuclear family is no longer the dominant forms of the family. This has brought a new struggle of identity which in the past was whether one could be both African and Christian. This time the struggle is whether one can be a citizen in democratic society and the Christian. I recognize that this refers to parts of Africa that are practicing democracy. However even in countries where there is dictatorship or military governments the question is still the same – whether one can be citizen (allegiance to dictator) and be Catholic. There are more questions that can be asked but am using this as an example to show that Africa is not uniform but consists of diverse experiences. I am choosing the democratic processes because these pose new challenges to the Church in Africa.

Developments that pose a challenge to the Church in Africa

1. Constitutional Democracies promoting equality of all citizens

Two contentious rights that are in conflict with the Church are equal rights of women and LGBTIQ.

a. Equal rights of women

African countries are signatories to international, pan African and regional treaties on human rights particularly gender rights. The recent addition is the Maputo Protocol that seeks to eradicate all discriminatory practices against women particularly in culture as a means of addressing the high levels of violence against women and the marginalization of women that sees women being the majority of the poor in the countries. The Maputo Protocol was adopted on 11 July 2003 following advocacy efforts led by the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women in Africa4 and civil society organizations. The Maputo Protocol contains almost identical provisions as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and expands legal protection for women.

  • Art. 2 of the Maputo Protocol defines discrimination against women as any distinction, exclusion or restriction or any differential treatment based on sex and whose objectives or effects compromise or destroy the recognition, enjoyment or the exercise by women, regardless of their marital status, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in all spheres of life. The definition of discrimination encompasses a variety of possible discriminatory actions having either the express purpose ( de jure ) or the actual effect ( de facto ) of discriminating against women. The Maputo Protocol prohibits practices that can perpetuate women’s inequality

  • The Maputo Protocol was adopted on 11 July 2003 following advocacy efforts led by the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women in Africa4 and civil society organizations. The Maputo Protocol contains almost identical provisions as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and expands legal protection for women.

The goal of 50/50 equality of women and men in every social structure. Africa has countries with the highest representation of women in Parliament with Rwanda topping the world! South Africa has also reached milestone with women constituting 50% of parliamentary portfolios. This creates a crisis of representation for women who have to negotiate two worlds the constitutional world of full democracy and equality that seeks to promote and shield women from all violations particularly discrimination and violence and the Church which in most cases does not deal with women’s issues because of fear of the unmentionable subject of ‘women’s ordination.’

Yet women form the majority of members in the church and their exclusion from voting and participation as was with the case of the synod on the family presents the church as moving in the opposite direction of continental and national goals of promoting gender equality and participation of women. It also creates a crisis of identity forcing women to live in two worlds of subordination in church and empowerment in the world. Can these two worlds continue to be in conflict creating challenges for women who want to be both Catholic and Citizen with equal rights? Is this sustainable for the Church to remain on the opposite side of democracy and human rights for women?

b. Equal Rights of LGBTI persons

Over the past few weeks two court decisions reflect the status of LGBTI in Africa the first is that of Kenya which upheld the criminalized homosexuality using the argument that it is a Christian country and therefore cannot support the rights of LGBTI[6]. In contrast last week Botswana decriminalized homosexuality because it is a violation of the constitutional rights of all citizens[7]. The same argument of being a ‘Christian country’ is used by Uganda, Tanzania, Zambia and many others to uphold laws that criminalize homosexuality and deny LGBTI persons equal rights. So Christianity is some countries is being over ruled in the name of constitutional democracy and this has implications for the role and status of the church as a moral and prophetic voice. This voice is increasingly being lost as many countries choose to be secular states.

Activists on LGBTI issues include parents and friends who refuse to stand by and watch their loved ones being abused and violated.

In a research on LGBTI done in 10 countries in Southern Africa they found increased tolerance in some countries and rigidity in others. The six main narratives on LGBTI were[8]

  • Legal narrative: ‘it is against the law’

  • Moral narrative: ‘it is against God’

  • Political narrative: ‘it is ‘unAfrican”

  • Public Health narrative: ‘it is an illness’

  • Media narrative: ‘it is scandalous’

  • Social Exclusion narrative: ‘they don’t belong

Homophobia continues to be a challenge although in some countries there is increase in tolerance and acceptance of LGBTI. Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa made a statement that he will not worship a homophobic God. The underlying issue is the human dignity of persons and Pope Francis upheld the dignity of LGBTI persons in Joy of Love stating clearly opposition to violence against them even though he did not support same sex marriage. For many people the first step is upholding dignity and ensuring that there is no violence against LGBTI. When one group is denied their rights and dignity it opens the door for the marginalization of other groups. The suffering of one group is the suffering of all because we are connected as the creation of God.

2. Courts as agents of change for marginalized groups

Recent decisions as mentioned before show that courts are now the agents of change towards achieving equality for all. Whereas in the Church power is invested in ecclesial authorities who determine the faith and can silence or excommunicate anyone whereas in civil society there are structures and processes for contestation, challenge by anyone who feels violated by the law. The legal system is dynamic and changes to ensure justice for all. This dynamic culture does not exist in the Church because the lay people have no power to challenge the authority of the magisterium. In the context of constitutional democracy that seeks to defend the dignity of citizens; freedom of speech; decolonial theories that challenge hierarchical power structures and interrogate social location of subjects in any discourse thus making the current culture of the Church out of sync with the rest of society. So once again there is a gap between the processes in the Church and socially acceptable norms including the promotion of rights and dignity of all citizens.

3. Changing nature of the family

The singular definition of the family as nuclear – one father, one mother and children does not reflect the reality of most people in different parts of Africa. Southern Africa has one of the lowest rates of marriage in the world and most of the households are intergenerational consisting and mostly headed by women[9]. So in this context the definition of family needs to be broadened in response to the realities of people in society and in the church. There is need once again for a listening church that starts with the experiences of people and their realities, engages with them so that together they can come up with innovative responses that can fulfil the mandate of the family within the different arrangements of family. To rigidly demand that only one type of family is legitimate is a decision to live outside the realities of life which make ministry irrelevant as it does not address the realities that people live in.

4. Migration to other churches

One of the reasons for the migration to other churches is the lack of ongoing formation of Catholics beyond confirmation. The type of formation is important because it needs to empower laity to engage creatively with the realities of their own lives and contexts. The paradigm of propositional truths that require assent must be replaced by critical thinking that requires faithful integration of context, culture, social and human sciences in matters of faith and practice. It is in such a context that there can be a true development of the sense of the faithful because they will be agents of their faith and not passive recipients. There are other reasons which include positions on status of women, sexual abuse scandal etc  

5. Increased secularization

One of the famous African theologians wrote that Africans are religious persons and religion is definitive for who they are but with increasing globalization and communication across the world, media secularization is increasing and there is need to address these issues too.

6. Sexual abuse scandal

Although the cases in Africa are not at the same scale as those in US and Europe, the voices of victims are slowly emerging and coming from minors, Sisters and lay women. How the Church in Africa will deal with these cases which are criminal activities will determine whether the Church is supportive of legal reforms protecting women and minors from violence or operates outside of the law. One of the outcomes is the loss of the moral and prophetic role of the Church in Africa. These scandals and the Church’s response will determine whether the public and laity can fully place their faith in the leadership of the Church.

Conclusion

There is still so much that can be said about the current status of the Church in Africa and the various lay organizations operating within the Church. There are few and far between organizations involved in reform and this may change due to the issues just mentioned. But the winds of change are blowing and are unstoppable! With Pope Francis and his commitment to reform offers a way forward for the African Church to rise up in all challenges as a prophetic voice. It is indeed a Kairos moment which offers an option for decisive change. Can we take up the moment and serve the people of Africa without discrimination or exclusion.

 

[1] http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_14091995_ecclesia-in-africa.html

[2] Masenya, Madipoane. “African Women Read the Bible” pages 64-78 page 69 Various Authors, 2000. Inculturation in the South African Context. Nairobi: Paulines Publications Africa, page 69

[3] Searching for the Lost Needle: Double Colonization & Postcolonial African Feminisms. By: Dube, Musa W., Studies in World Christianity, 13549901, 1999, Vol. 5, Issue 2 page 216-223

[4] Mikell, Gwendolyn. “African Feminism:Toward a New politics of Representation” Feminist Studies, Vol. 21 (Summer, 1995) pp. 405-424

[5] http://ujamaa.ukzn.ac.za/Libraries/manuals/The_Kairos_Documents.sflb.ashx

[6] https://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFKCN1SU1M7-OZATP

[7] https://qz.com/africa/1640687/botswana-decriminalizes-homosexuality/

[8] http://theotherfoundation.org/learning/

[9] www.africastrategic.com

Reform

Moving our Church forward today with both the Church and Society in turmoil

by Rene Reid, Director CCRI      

Challenges

Two major challenges:

1. Inability to move the hierarchy

  • True regardless of what part of the world we’re from,
  • strongest opposition to Pope Francis' efforts to make substantial reforms to the Church comes from his own curia and a significant number of bishops, sadly, the U.S. bishops being some of the strongest opponents to him.
  • Most bishops are unwilling to dialog with the faithful especially in matters relating to official Church teaching, such as sexuality, birth control, true women's equality, welcoming the LGBT community, the divorced and remarried welcomed to the Eucharist, holding bishops accountable.
  • Even though Pope Francis envisions the Church as an upside-down pyramid, if only the Faithful actually participated in the governance of the Church – not just consultative but also in a determining capacity, all of these issues would be resolved.

2. Difficulty to motivate the Faithful to take action.

  • The vast majority of Catholics worldwide are disgusted with Church leadership--especially how they have dealt with the clerical sex abuse crisis.
  • But most of the laity aren’t able to see that the responsibility rests with us. We, the Faithful, are the Church.

CCRI’s Plan of action

Because of the difficulty in productively dealing with the hierarchy, the CCRI has decided to spend 80% of its efforts working with the "grassroots" and 20% still trying to directly influence the Institutional Church.

The Grassroots approach:

The clerical sex abuse crisis, horrible as it is, is stirring the people to want change. But it is only a symptom of deeper maladies in the clerical/hierarchical culture.

A. Root causes of this crisis: power, authority, and clericalism

· the Church’s misogynist exclusion of women in the Church

· its requirement of mandatory celibacy for priests despite not all are geared for a celibate lifestyle.

B. Many of us working as reformers because we have Francis instead of Benedict. But even Francis, with all his goodness, continues however to protect these two pillars of clericalism. While he talks of a decentralized church, he still has failed to bring lay people into positions of power.

C. A Church with the people having a deliberative voice in the governance of the Church will never come from the top down. No one with power has ever willingly given it up. It will only come from the bottom up.

1. Some headway has been made over the years. Despite church policies, women today do use birth control; divorced people do receive the Sacraments; purpose of lovemaking is no longer understood as only a means of reproduction but also recognized is an expression of love and pleasure. but there is so much more we as leaders of reform can do.

2. Model offered by Caesar Chavez: (1) getting the migrant workers to come out of the fields and stand together on the picket lines; (2) hard pressed, only then were farm owners willing to come to the negotiation table and discuss fair wages and working conditions. Likewise, how can we move the laity to come out of the fields of the Church pews, stop picking the grapes, stop contributing to the collection basket, so that we can get the attention of the powers that be?

3. What if multitudes of the faithful, appalled by what the sex-abuse crisis has shown the Church leadership to have become, were to detach themselves from—and renounce—the Roman collar power structure of the Church and reclaim Vatican II’s insistence that the power structure is not the Church. The Church is the people of God.

4. That spirit of resistance is what must energize reform-minded Catholics now—an anticlericalism from within. That is the stance that we at CCRI are choosing to take. If there are like-minded, anticlerical priests, then we will make common cause with them. Think of us as the Church’s conscientious objectors. We are not deserters.

What are the specific action steps that each of us here today can begin to generate when we return home?

1. Building Small Faith Communities – a return to the early days of the Church before there were ordained ministers. We are strongly encouraging the People of God to return to the days of the early Church ]when Christians gathered in underground catacombs. Today, we’re meeting all over the United States in peoples’ homes. Sometimes there is an ordained minister. Sometimes a former now married priest. Sometimes liturgies are being led by the laity including women.

· Small Christian Communities, Intentional Eucharistic Communities--Comunidades Ecclasia de Base—in homes, parishes, college communities, or any group of interested people. The focus will be on "Gospel" values.

· May include members who are still part of a parish life; those who abandoned the institutional church; some led by ordained ministers; others by lay men and women.

· No matter who presides at whatever form the altar takes, such adaptations of Eucharistic observance return to the theological essence of the sacrament. Christ is experienced not through the officiant but through the faith of the whole community. “For where two or three are gathered in my name,” Jesus said, “there am I in the midst of them.”

· I am so convinced that to move the Church forward, we need to return to the format of the Church as it was in the early days: Christians gathering in homes, in catacombs, wherever they could to love one another, support one another, and celebrate the remembrance of Jesus Christ. When they gathered, they reenacted the last supper together. There were no ordained ministers, no authority figures. There were just followers of Jesus Christ. Through our baptism, we are the Church and the Spirit works through each of us to do her work. If it is the Holy Spirit who transforms the bread and wine, then the presider is only an instrument. Priesthood need not be a calling to some “higher state” that​ only sexually pure celebrate men could fulfill. By virtue of our baptism, priesthood is open to all.

2. Bringing millennials together – they are the future of the Church.

· Start or join a small faith community of their own – physically or online

· Online community calls: This could involve the community working for social justice, environmental justice, gender and racial justice.

· The social, environmental and other justice issues are especially appealing to "millennials"--young adults 18 to 35. CCRI and CTA--USA millennials are working together to reach out to this demographic.

3. Joining or initiating a parish council with the lay people taking charge of the parish – unwilling to sit only in an advisory position.

4. As anticlerical Catholics, we will form our own tribunals to oversee the clerical sex abuse crisis. They cannot be the foxes watching over their own hen houses. We will simply refuse to accept that the business-as-usual attitudes of most priests and bishops should extend to us, as the walls of their temple collapse around them.

5. Forming teams to offer solidarity to those in need – to asylum seekers; to children separated from their parents; to victims of earthquakes, fires, and hurricanes (see poster)

Directly Dealing with the Reform of the Hierarchical Church--20% effort:

1. First make an effort to find "common ground" as much as possible with the different reform groups. so that we can make a united front on the substantive issues.

2. Encourage local bishops to have local "synods" to dialog on the state of the diocese, what do people like about it; what turns them off or drives them away? What changes need to be made to better reflect Gospel values and Jesus-like behavior.

3. Calling for, demanding, a diocesan synod.

4. Join with other reform groups and jointly request your national bishops to each host a synod in their diocese. Such an event is being planned in the Amazon and in Australia.

The church I envision:

· Slowly over time in ways that cannot be predicted and have no central direction, the exiles, these conscientious objectors who backed off from the clerical-led church will become the core of Christianity - just as exiles were the core at the time of Jesus. As priesthood diminishes in the form we know it today, and as millennials become middle-aged, Christian worship will be experienced in smaller communities; the focus will shift from the earthbound institution of the Church to its transcendent meaning of Christianity. This is already happening, in front of our eyes. Tens of millions of moral decisions and personal actions are being made by the choice to be Catholic Christians on our own terms, untethered from the institutional church as we once knew it. We do not need clerical permission. Our “fasting and abstaining” from officially ordered practice will go on for as long as the Church’s rebirth, its re-founding requires, whether we live to see it finished or not.

· In what way, one might ask, can such institutional detachment square with actual Catholic Christian identity that is inevitably forthcoming? Their ranks could include ad hoc organizers of priest-less parishes; parents who band together for the sake of the religious instruction of youngsters; social activists who take on injustice in the name of Jesus; and even social-media wizards launching, say, #ChurchResistors or #LayLeaders. As always, the Church’s principal organizing event will be the communal experience of the Mass, with reading the Word and breaking the bread remaining universal; it will not need to be celebrated by a member of the clergy. The gradual ascendance of lay leaders in the Church is in any case becoming a fact of life, driven by shortages of personnel and expertise.

· If, down through the ages, it was appropriate for the Church to take on the political structures of imperial Rome or feudal Europe, then why shouldn’t Catholicism we envision absorb the form of democracy? The Church I foresee will be overseen by laypeople. There will be leaders who gather communities in worship, and because of tradition, such sacramental enablers may well be known as priests. They will include women and married people. They will see themselves as equal to everyone else. Catholic religious orders of men and women, some voluntarily celibate, will continue to live in contemplative practice and demonstrate the social Gospel. Jesuits and Dominicans, Benedictines and Franciscans, the Catholic Worker Movement and other communities of liberation theology—all of these will survive in as yet unimagined forms.

· The Church will be fully alive at the local level, even if the faith is practiced more in living rooms than in basilicas. And the Church will still have a worldwide reach, with some kind of organizing center, perhaps even in Rome for old times’ sake. But that center will be protected from Catholic triumphalism by being fully engaged with other Christian denominations. This imagined Church of the future will have more in common with the early Church. And as all of this implies, clericalism will be long dead. Instead of destroying a Catholic’s love of the Church, the vantage of the conscientious objectors movement bringing in lay leadership can reinforce it—making the essence of the faith more alive than ever.

· I spent years working in the field of network marketing, and I learned from that experience, that what I am describing has to begin slowly and with only a few people. We can each reach out to a few others and teach them, in turn, to reach out to a few others, who reach out yet again. As the message continues to go out into the world, soon we have thousands upon thousands and millions upon millions who share our beliefs. We have been called here to Sao Paulo as modern day apostles.

Conclusion:

It is my hope that as we leave Sao Paulo, we will realize our calling to return home – each in our little region of the world – called to evangelize in a manner appropriate to our modern age. The early Apostles had to reach out to communities going on foot. Today we have the internet, cell phones in our pockets. Sign up for a You Tube channel or a podcast of your own and evangelize the church we envision. If you feel called to be a part of a small Christian Community, do it, and encourage others to join or begin one of their own. Let’s reach out to those who are searching or who have left the Church and invite them into to these communities. Let us realize our calling to stand in solidarity with the poor, the hungry, the downtrodden, with those running from tyranny and do what we can to offer them asylum. We are Christians and they’ll know we are Christians by our love.